Introduction
The Faculty for Justice in Palestine (FJP) is a network of faculty members across U.S. universities and colleges who advocate for Palestinian rights and support the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement. The FJP operates within academic spaces to raise awareness about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, challenge what they view as the complicity of U.S. institutions in Israeli occupation policies, and foster academic freedom on the issue of Palestine.

History and Origins
The FJP Network was formed in the early 2010s by faculty members who felt that Palestinian rights were underrepresented in academic discourse and that there was a growing need for solidarity with Palestinians in the struggle against Israeli occupation. FJP emerged from the broader academic and activist communities supporting BDS and seeking to challenge the pro-Israel narrative in higher education.
The network was established as a response to what members saw as the suppression of critical discussions about Israel on U.S. campuses, often in the form of administrative pushback, pressure from pro-Israel organizations, or accusations of anti-Semitism. FJP’s goal was to create a safe space for faculty to advocate for Palestinian rights without fear of retribution.

Mission and Goals
FJP’s mission is to advocate for justice and equality for Palestinians, and to support the academic and cultural boycott of Israel as part of the broader BDS movement. The network seeks to challenge Israel’s occupation of Palestinian territories, raise awareness of Palestinian struggles in academic settings, and defend the academic freedom of those who speak out on behalf of Palestine.
FJP’s goals include:

• Promoting the academic and cultural boycott of Israeli institutions that they argue are complicit in the occupation.
• Supporting faculty members who face repercussions for their stance on Palestine or for their involvement in the BDS movement.
• Educating students, faculty, and the public on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and fostering critical discussions on U.S. foreign policy toward Israel.
• Advocating for the human rights and self-determination of Palestinians, in line with international law and human rights standards.

Main Activities and Campaigns
FJP focuses on several key activities and campaigns that aim to influence academic discourse and policy regarding Palestine:

• Advocacy for BDS: The primary focus of FJP is promoting the BDS movement within academia. FJP calls on faculty members and academic institutions to support the boycott of Israeli academic institutions and to divest from companies and organizations that benefit from or contribute to the occupation.
• Public Statements and Petitions: FJP regularly issues public statements and organizes petitions to protest Israeli policies and U.S. support for Israel, particularly in moments of heightened conflict in Gaza or the West Bank. These efforts aim to influence public opinion, academic institutions, and policymakers.
• Academic Freedom Defense: FJP works to defend the rights of faculty members and students who come under fire for their pro-Palestinian activism or support of BDS. This includes providing legal support, advocacy, and solidarity in cases where individuals face institutional repercussions or accusations of anti-Semitism for their activism.
• Conferences and Panels: FJP organizes academic conferences, panels, and discussions on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the role of academia in activism, and the global implications of the occupation. These events provide a platform for scholars to discuss Palestine-related issues in a critical and supportive environment.

Controversies and Criticism
FJP, like many groups advocating for Palestinian rights and supporting BDS, has been the subject of significant criticism, particularly from pro-Israel organizations and advocates. The main points of controversy include:

• Accusations of Anti-Semitism: FJP’s support for the BDS movement and its criticism of Israel has led to accusations of anti-Semitism from some Jewish organizations and pro-Israel groups. Critics argue that by targeting Israel, FJP singles out the Jewish state in a way that fuels anti-Semitic sentiments. FJP and its supporters reject this, stating that their opposition is to Israeli government policies, not to Jews or Judaism.
• Academic Boycotts: FJP’s advocacy for the academic boycott of Israeli institutions has been a point of contention. Critics argue that boycotting academic institutions undermines academic freedom and the free exchange of ideas, particularly when it targets Israeli scholars who may not be directly involved in government policies. FJP maintains that Israeli academic institutions are complicit in the occupation, and therefore, the boycott is justified.
• Polarization on Campuses: FJP’s activities have contributed to a polarized environment on some campuses, with intense debates between pro-Palestinian and pro-Israel faculty and students. This has sometimes led to accusations that FJP stifles opposing views or creates a hostile atmosphere for pro-Israel voices on campus.

Activity on Campuses
FJP is active on university and college campuses, often collaborating with student groups such as Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP). The network organizes events, discussions, and panels that aim to educate students and faculty on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, U.S. foreign policy, and the role of academia in supporting Palestinian rights.
FJP faculty often advocate for the passing of BDS-related resolutions within faculty senates and work to support student-led BDS campaigns. They are also involved in defending academic freedom for those who speak out on behalf of Palestine, challenging attempts to silence or punish pro-Palestinian activists.

Impact and Influence
FJP has played a notable role in shifting discussions about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict within academia. Its efforts have:

• Amplified Pro-Palestinian Voices: FJP has created a platform for faculty members to advocate for Palestinian rights and support BDS without fear of institutional repercussions. This has helped normalize criticism of Israeli policies in academic settings where such discussions were once more limited.
• Increased Awareness of Palestinian Rights: Through public statements, petitions, and educational events, FJP has contributed to a growing awareness of Palestinian struggles and U.S. complicity in the Israeli occupation within the academic community.
• Influenced BDS Advocacy: FJP’s efforts have supported the growth of the BDS movement within academia, leading to the passage of divestment resolutions at several institutions and increasing pressure on universities to cut ties with companies or entities involved in the occupation.

However, FJP’s influence remains controversial, with some faculty, students, and institutions resisting its calls for boycotts or divestment, citing concerns about academic freedom or the potential for increased division on campus.

Internal Structure and Organization
FJP is a decentralized network, with faculty members from various universities and colleges across the U.S. participating on an individual or collective basis. There is no formal hierarchy or central leadership, but faculty collaborate through regional and national networks to coordinate campaigns, share resources, and support each other’s work.
FJP operates primarily through grassroots organizing, with faculty members initiating and leading local actions in their respective institutions. The network often coordinates with broader BDS organizations and student groups like SJP to maximize the impact of its campaigns.

Conclusion
The Faculty for Justice in Palestine Network has become an influential force within U.S. academia, advocating for Palestinian rights and supporting the BDS movement. Through its focus on academic and cultural boycotts, public advocacy, and defense of academic freedom, FJP has shifted conversations about Israel and Palestine within higher education. However, its work remains polarizing, with strong opposition from pro-Israel organizations and ongoing debates about the implications of its activism on academic freedom and campus climate.